Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
thats not true at all its a g9 thing, for exemple g9 has a "resting focal point" for the eyes wich in turn makes the eyes fucking up when you create morphs for it, oputing it to 0 when you gon save the morphs it gives errors when loading the morph.... its a G9 thing unfortunatly.
some creators had even to create "eye fix" morphs becuse of that, what i dont understand is vyktorya is not a nub she should kknow how to fix that unless shes new to g9
this is the way i fixed it.
on zonegfx page right click anywhere and press inspect.
now with the inspect window open go to refresh thingie on top of the page *that little arrow in a circle".
right click on the refresh tingie and click on "empty cache and hard reload" i did that and it fixed that way you clear the cache only for zonegfx site@MathMathou What you mean by "flushed the cache"?
to be fair, i agree with the "they have better things to do" plus i dont think law enforcement cares that much about it if you are not making money out of it.
OFC it has exceptions,for exemple a seller might want to take you to court by himself becuse of that, but i doubt anyone or any seller would take someone to court becuse of a thing that costed 100$ specialy since court and legal bills would cost alot more then that for both parties
this seems weird as fuck, not saying its a scam or anything its just weird.
firstly why the weird time limit of five days seems like one of those "grab it now while you still can" to make someone worryed they might loose the sale.
secondly why the fuck they can only refund it by check, a site that uses paypal, bank transfer etc etc to pay creators now all of a sudden can only exchange money by check^? wtfidk what happand to 3duk sooo someone fill me in?
i looked on google and found just 3duk ranting daz stole hes products and made them to g9....
funny i wonder if he has the rights from paramount and stuff to sell star trek stuff or am i missing something here?
i got my answer i talked with him he is a really nice guy and helped me a bunch so, and i was wrong on this matter.
i didnt said it was an AI created image, i said/asked if it was enhanced with AI, AI created and enhanced with AI is diferent.
i agree that most artists might be tired of getting "exploited" by the ones asking questions, but saying an youtuber gives help when there is nothing to win is not true, of course i am not talking about all of them, but PA's have alot to win when they give help that being fame and more people checking out theyr products, same with youtubers, if they give help there will be more people cheking theyr youtube channel and more people subscribing, so yes there is something to gain if they help others, and i dont hold it agaisnt them, its just how it is, its life.
on the image topic, i know the hole image is not created with ai, becuse i know parts of the outfits and i know shoelace is a great artist, what i wanted to know is if there is some AI enhancing on it and/or if someone has any good photoshop tutorials to help me achieve something close to it or at least to help me learn more about photoshop.
@frank21 i did, but most of the time people tend to not answer when is someone asking for help unless there is something to be gain with it, and most of the time people will just not help.
@frank21 well then let me know your secrets if it doesnt need much to reproduce something like that, and or maybe point me to some tutorials, becuse all i can find as a tutorial is "how to edit your architectural render with photoshop, and or "i edited my viewers photos" on youtube and none good tutorial
mitchell is good but i would put it on .85/90 .70 is too much imo some people say it dsoesnt make difference, but when i rendered with daz i was using mitchell on .85 sometimes .90.
edit for lighting i would search for daz 3 point light its whaty most people use, special in photoshoots
@ADAM that is not the point tho its fine if you mark it and its fine if you dont its whatever but saying a image is fucked up becuse of a watermark is stupid, people will watermark theyr image for alot of reasons, its not a matter of pride or not is a matter of not wanting other to make money out of your work, i dont mind if someone downloads an image and shares it with other people, what i mind is people downloading an image and selling it as theyr own, that is the point of watermark.
yes sure alot of excellent artists that dont watermark thats becuse they are already established and everyone knows who they are and just a look to that images tells who made it, even some big companys watermark theyr concept art and theyr art.
plus i have never seen your works or whatever all ive seen from you is bringing down someones images comparing them to big artists, someone that is learning doesnt need to be compared to someone that has been doing art for over 10 years or 5 years you comparing them to other excelent artist makes no sense at all even if some great artist doesnt watermark ther will be another great artist that watermarks it.
plus your comparison to wonderland makes no sense since wonderland is an asset product and not an image, anyone that sells it can have problems, and this image its just that an image selling it or not will not lead to nothing, you like to compare things alot.
