Daz3d Or Character Creator

"pussy thoughts"???

Well, its a good thing that was clarified, I was just about to start sharing a ton of my pussy thoughts.

Zbrush is actually marketed tp Pussy thoughts people

Are pussy thoughts better than penis thoughts? Are we thinking about the same thing?

Being there is more daz content here and this is primarily a daz forum converting to AI, Id say Daz for a little while longer then everything will be AI.

Krea didnt like it either. its a fairly beginner friendly AI though

Daz Studio is entertainment art software that is aimed at entry level users. It lacks numerous industry standard options/features and has extremely limited tools/options for animation or use within a production workflow. This makes it less useful for games/VFX usage except as a character designer (but even that has issues). Daz Studio is barely recognized in the 3D art/design community due to its severe limitations and lack of support for industry standard 3D formats. The user-friendly click-and-go features of Daz Studio (coupled with a mediocre ray-tracing render engine) make it appealing to users who want to quickly render 3D artwork without actually having to learn 3D modeling or other complex features.

Character Creator (and iClone) is more popular for people doing game development and animation and is less "entry level" with more industry standard options and features. It's widely used in the Unreal pipeline and in game design. CC/iClone have render engines but are more widely considered adjuncts to game design as opposed to self-contained "art tools" for rendering images/animations in and of themselves. For example, one would design characters and scenes with CC/iClone but would export them for use in other engines/pipelines.

Comparing them is disingenuous because they are vastly different applications targeting different types of users. It would be like comparing FaceApp and Photoshop. One is a toy the other is a tool. Both can be used for fun but only one is a full-fledged art/design tool.

This site (ZoneGfx) is primarily focused on Daz content so it obviously is more "popular" here but that shouldn't be construed as implying that Daz Studio is widely used or any kind of standard. Daz Studio has a very small niche following and its development has severely stagnated in the past ten years leaving it far behind in terms of capability and usefulness aside from rendering standalone images. It is essentially novelty art software.

Fewer pirate sites exist for CC/iClone largely due to its professional userbase who typically purchase and/or make their own content for commercial release (hence making pirated content immediately problematic).

Just my two cents'-worth on the topic. I may seem dismissive toward Daz Studio but in my opinion it's just looking at it realistically. I use DS daily but am well aware that it's essentially just a toy now, and one that is severely outdated and lacking in features.