Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
The first thing that caught my eye was the wound plasters. I think it’s a nice touch. The ballerinas also go nicely with what she’s trying to bring to life. Yes, a simple animation that expresses a fair few things.!
Such beautiful movements. She’s really quite lovely and has such a charming presence. I really enjoyed watching her. May I ask who that character is?
Some of it can be amusing.....
You think that's amusing? I think it's disgusting and pathetic! Sorry, but I'm just wired differently.
Rest in peace, dear Lady Anja,
A gentle soul, forever bright.
Though you've left this earthly journey,
You'll live on in love and light.May peaceful winds now carry you,
Where hearts know neither pain nor fear.
Forever missed, forever loved—
Lady Anja, always near.How charming. You’re right. The animation is quite impressive... Her loose expressions and fluid movements make her really appealing.
I don’t understand any of this. I can access this site without any problems. Everything is there. Maybe it’s to do with the country you live in. Probably everyone here is from the US. Or maybe I’m too stupid to understand any of it. I’m gradually getting elderly.
@blizzard2089 There’s an option to set the site to: SafeSite, Moderate, Mature or Strict if you want to see nips.
She looks really cute. It’s just the DOF in the animation I can’t quite get to grips with. It’s also nice to see some activity in this forum again. Keep up the good work, Felicia.
Like this Temu 911 that never happened:
In short.....,,,...
I'm not a big fan of AI either:
I just wanted to hear your reaction when I ran your text through ChatGPT.
And by the way... you’ve got some really fine stuff on SoundCloud. I think that name is cool, too “Konstanz Ketchup” it sounds pretty “red.”
So just keep making your music and forget about all that AI crap.
Have a lovely day!Interesting statement. “Whatever they're telling us is BS,” etc.....
I thought, “Why don't you try feeding your statement into ChatGPT, what is AI!! Its funny to see what comes out.”This comment mixes legitimate concerns with speculation, conspiracy claims, and factual inaccuracies. Here's a breakdown:
### Claims that are reasonable
* There is a genuine debate about how quickly AI should be developed and whether safety measures are keeping up.
* Governments, companies, and researchers are concerned about AI being used in military systems, cyberattacks, and misinformation.
* Many science fiction authors—including Frank Herbert, Philip K. Dick, Isaac Asimov, and screenwriter Bill Wisher—have explored the dangers of powerful AI and autonomous technology.### Claims that are speculative or unsupported
The following statements are presented without evidence:
* **"They are priming our minds so they can claim AI took over defense on its own."**
* There is no public evidence that governments or AI companies have such a coordinated plan.
* **"One of the chosen tech bros becomes emperor god of the world."**
* This is rhetorical language expressing distrust, not a factual prediction.
* **"They'll pretend it's out of their control."**
* Again, this is speculation about future intentions.
* **"Media outlets are lying on behalf of these crooks."**
* That's a broad accusation requiring substantial evidence. The comment provides none.
### The section about China and Russia
The author argues that if China or Russia are capable cyber powers, they must also be equally advanced in AI.
Reality is more nuanced:
* Both China and Russia have strong AI researchers and programmers.
* China is widely considered one of the world's leading AI powers.
* Russia has capable AI talent but generally invests less than the U.S. or China.
* Cybersecurity capability and cutting-edge AI development overlap somewhat but are **not the same thing**. A country can excel in one area without leading in the other.So the author's either/or argument is a **false dilemma**.
### "AI becoming self-aware"
Today's AI systems, including ChatGPT, are **not self-aware or conscious**. They generate responses by recognizing patterns in data rather than possessing understanding, desires, or awareness.
Many AI experts debate future risks from increasingly capable AI, but there is no evidence that current systems are conscious.
### "No guard rails"
This is exaggerated.
Major AI developers do employ safeguards such as:
* testing before deployment,
* content moderation,
* red-teaming (attempting to find weaknesses),
* monitoring misuse,
* ongoing safety research.Whether those safeguards are sufficient is a matter of debate, but it is inaccurate to say there are **no guardrails at all**.
### Overall assessment
The comment is best understood as a strongly worded opinion rather than a factual analysis.
It contains:
* ✅ legitimate concerns about AI safety and military use,
* ✅ references to well-known science fiction warnings,
* ⚠️ several conspiracy-style assertions presented without evidence,
* ⚠️ logical fallacies (such as false dilemmas and sweeping generalizations),
* ⚠️ emotionally charged rhetoric that goes well beyond what the available evidence supports.It's entirely reasonable to question how AI should be governed. However, claims about secret plans, deliberate deception, or inevitable dystopian outcomes require evidence beyond what's presented in this comment.
They thrive on negativity
You might be right @antharaes . But sometimes... I can't hold it in, and then it just bursts out.
