- This topic has 50 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 8 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
What is going on with the near nude poses lately? My daughter liked to look through the site to find assets, but that is no longer an option with all these nasty pictures, guys with strange colored dicks instead of the normal censored jpg.
I guess I'll go first......
It's 'interesting' (See how I'm not using words like hypocritical? I'm learning to not be confrontational with emotional trigger words.) that no one says anything about scenes that depict torture, death or humiliating, demeaning, misogynistic acts. @Redflag's recent post of Maria, which I assume is the subject of this post, doesn't show anything that one can't see in a lingerie site or someplace selling bikinis. Since when is a man's nipple fine while a lady's nipple is pornographic, naughty, nasty, unholy, ungodly, pagan, blasphemous, heathen, impious, sacrilegious, irreverent, godless, irreligious, atheistical, unchurched, churchless, atheistic, unhallowed, profane, unconsecrated and not fit to be seen?Rank:
No... he is probably referring to this one.
Maybe I was a little over-zealous when blocking out the penis... but I wanted to make sure I got it all so nobody would complain about nudity.
Regardless.
I wonder if Dick's daughter asked him what "Missionary for Genesis 9" was all about when he posted it?
Did she ask you what "Honey Poses" were? By the way Dick, that was a great conversion from GF8 to 9... a big thanks!, as we can always use a few more female masturbation poses.... you might want to re-up some links cause the workupload is the only one that is currently active.
At the end of the day though.... what the lesson for you daughter... stealing is good and the human body is bad? She does know about the stealing part.... right?
Nasty is nasty, there's no other way to put it.
My daughter understands we need to support developers and artist and not to simply leech. We spend a great deal of money in the 3D community.
Glad you liked the Honey Poses I converted. I'll try to put up some more links before they get taken down as well.I understand the issue you have Dick (no pun intended) and I'm sure we all appreciate your shares. It is assumed that the site caters to only adults so it may not be a good idea to let the underaged view its content as much of it is highly sexualised. There has been talk about having an NSFW section or a site filter but nothing has come of that so far.
@frank22 .. a site filter or NSFW section does not actually solve the problem.. it only shifts the blame to the one who is using the Zone.. we can just say "we had a separate section and it was You who went there"..
Well the OP says the daughter understands the concept of supporting developers and artists and they together spend a great deal of money in the 3D community, so I would say she isn't exactly an innocent babe in the woods. While fathers are naturally over-protective of their daughter's presumed innocence she's apparently no Snow White. With two daughters I've been through that and sometimes you need to put your foot down and say NO, this is not for you. Parenting isn't easy but they'll thank you later.
We should not expose our kids to nudity, for that will shatter their little brains...
It's ok to show live footage of wars, gruesome accidents.
But it is ok to play computer games where all you do is butcher innocents or zombies ( OH zombies are SWF )
Also it is ok to just steel work from artists ( no matter if and how much we spend, every upload here deprives the artist off potential customer)I have been ranting about this before, but I don't get this double standard.
What are we afraid off?All our kids will become deprived adults, going to bizarre parties to give away there body and soul to Satan in their attempt to quench there unstoppable lust?
In a country like America, where one can not show an inch off flesh, teenage pregnancies are highest in the western world, 80 % off the porn is produced there.
It seems to me that this prude attitude does not pay off.
In a world where hardcore porn is one URL away, do we really think that it helps, sheltering the young from " dirty pics" ?
It would be better to teach respect, that physical attraction and sex are just one piece off the puzzle when it comes to inter human relationships, that we teach there are different preferences, and that that is ok.
Maybe the amount off rapes, pregnancies, attacks on gays, would demise...If anyone is as old as I am and went to Scandinavia in the late 70s or early 80s you'd know how accepted social mores have been turned on its head. Any sort, and I mean any sort, of sexual activity being it animal, vegetable of mineral was completely legal and openly on sale. While I can't condone or un-see half of what I saw it helps to appreciate the extremes of two disparate time periods and how society's norms have shifted.
That might be Frank, but when is the last time you hade a go with the moose LOL
I mean, there might have been extremities, but it isn't so a whole generation turned into Calligula.
Might be just me, but it feels a bit like Sharia police.
As I said before, there is flesh on every corner of the internet, from artisticly innocent to outright extreme gore necrophilia.
I understand parents want to shelter their young from certain images.
The question is, where do we draw the line?
Especially in this day and age where everybody seems to be offended about almost everything that does not fit in their view of the world.
If that is gonna be the standard, then al we will see in the end is solid black JPG's.
I saw NSFW warnings on rendo, so opened them and it was figure in bathing suit/underwear.
So even with the "private" parts covered, it is not safe to watch!
To me it feels like a slippery slope....In the near future? genesis 10 Female lingerie bundle
I don't even a little bit understand why "people shouldn't be forced to look at porn in order to use a website to get a cool 3d model of a robot from" is such a difficult concept for people to either understand or respect.
Like yeah, anyone *can* go out and find porn anytime they want. They shouldn't have to work that hard to avoid it, though. We don't need NSFW content fucking *everywhere*.
"Graphic violence is ok to show to kids, but not nudity!" is not the damning statement you think it is. I'd say society is currently pretty backwards, sure, and we should have a lot less violence in mass media. That doesn't mean we have to be inundated with fucking fetish porn everywhere we go. Even if I go to the "Environments and Props" page, the stuff I'm on here for 99% of the time, I can't get away from it. There's sex machines and fetish gear *right next to cool robots and interiors*
Call me a prude, I don't give a shit. It should be very, very simple. If someone doesn't consent to being shown sexual content, then you don't show them sexual content. If someone doesn't consent to being shown violent content, then you don't show them violent content. Why is this a difficult or contentious concept?
My hero @Redflag just posted the SpeedStorm vibrator, a SEX TOY *gasp!*
It shouldn't be long before someone takes offense I expect.the easiest solution is to just use tags on posts for NSFW or violence or whatever else, then each user settings, make it selectable to things the user does not wish to see. Those posts are filtered out. Problem solved, no need for separate sections.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
