- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I have two versions of IM00082440-01_Kayden81.zip, they differ from size but have the same amount of files and all files are equal of size, still one is 810.893.847 bytes[09-29-2021] and one is 738.552.635 bytes[06-11-2021] in size. Both are definitely not the same so the difference is in the compression i think. Which one is the original one, can anyone tell me the crc32 of the original zipfile or just show their crc32 of their file so i can compare? Still its weird that they are different in size
Huh, funny that. Maybe do a 'quick and dirty' check:
Make two new folders.
Copy each zip into one of the folders.
Unzip each archive.
Delete the zips in each folder.
See if the folder sizes match.If they don't, post back and we'll take it to the next level.
The one from the bundle seems like your best bet to be the original. Did you download both the bundle and the individual one?
Jorgen74: Folder size matches, even the dates are the same, only things different are the size and date of the im00082440-1 zip files. But as Trader mentioned, maybe one is from the bundle and one is not, i have the bundle and the standalone. I guess i should take a look at the fileheader then or something. Still strange they would use different compression rate in their line of work, unless some sort of 'extras' was put into one of the zips. Upon comparison totalcmd says: "Not enough memory search aborted, the two files are DIFFERENT". I have never had that result before, have 32g of ram and lots of free gigs of free space. Normally it always shows the differences but now for the first time it does and/or cannot.
By the way the dates are the same, but the time differs exactly one hour from eachother. Each has some files of a different date, but each and every file differs exactly one hour, dates match up. Even the files are an identical match says totalcmd. except for the zipfiles
crc32
IM00082440-01_Kayden81.zip 2F023B4E
IM00082440-01_Kayden81.zip C1B13E02The folders Content have identical sha512 codes, as do the manifest and supplement files.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
