Face Transfer 2 for G9 (free trial) vs Face Transfer 1 results

[maryssmith]

Face Transfer 2 for G9, without additional morphing and texturing

Face Transfer 1 for G8, using the same photo without additional morphing and texturing

Hard to tell which one is better/worse (FT2 can remove hairs and FT1 is better at eyes). If I had to choose one, then FT1 for G8

For those who don't know, Face Transfer 2 for G9 (free trial) is available in 4.22.0.7 Beta. Now sure how it works for you guys. Welcome to try it out and show your results!

[Frank21]

Can't see any difference. The major issue for FT 1 or 2, or any of these one-shot solutions is that they lack depth info so anything but face-on pics don't work out well.
Releasing FT2 now kills any hope that DS5 is anywhere near. DS5 will have a new SDK and so will break existing plug-ins, so it wouldn't be released as a DS4 plugin if DS5 was near completion.

[eelgoo]

Earlier similar software avoided that 2D issue by requiring a front shot & a profile shot.

Yet again they have managed to take a big step backwards.

:0/

[Frank21]

Now that I've been training Loras I realise how important it is to use shots from multiple angles and a variety of lighting and expressions. The same goes for the earlier deepfake technology. You really can't expect much from one or two photos.
As far as I can see FT2 AI is only used to align texture/s with the model and adjust skin tone and pretty much all else is already in FT1. It's a step in the right direction but hardly a "pivotal moment" as the hype claims.

[Tim42]

FT2 is a little intriguing to me as a Mac user, as FT1 hasn't been available for Mac. So even if it is not better than FT1, it is better than nothing. I will need to install the beta and take a look.

[maryssmith]

Sorry for asking this layman's question: what are some good tutorials for 2D-image-to-3D-model LoRA or Stable Diffusion etc. in particular for human figures?

[Frank21]

[Frank21]

People are starting to show off their FT2 creations over at Daz. They're so bad I'm thinking it might being sarcastic. It's quite a trick for FT2 to make G9 look 1000% worse than the stock base character, as bad as that is itself.... congrats.

[maryssmith]

Thanks! Are these just for producing 2D images? I really hope to get 3D models, especially those under Daz Genesis 8 meshes..

And I agree that the results above for FT2 really sucks... I hope they should at least make a comparison to the original image like I did.

[Architector]

Extremely hard to morphing in G9. Because the one UV map.

[eelgoo]

TBH I won't have anything to do with G9 characters.

I'm quite happy with G8.1F or even G8F

🙂

[Author]

Posts