- This topic has 7 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 1 hour, 43 minutes ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I was minding my own business on YouTube, when I checked notifications and saw that the official DAZ 3D channel released a new video advertising their new feature. I went on the website and saw that it was available to use right now too. I want to know y'all's thoughts on this. Me personally? I prefer to render traditionally without AI, but I wouldn't mind playing around with it a little bit to see if it's worth it.
it's an art generator. uses points (aka tokens), just like with ChatGPT and other GenAI tools.
this could spark the beginning of the end for DAZ
"AI render time reducer", "AI no duplicates formula", "AI render use iddle GPU and leave alone my CPU". "AI make my dials not take eternity to work"... those are the only features I need
also, it's using GrokAI for the generations... yeah, not surprised coming from a company based in Utah
Oof really? Is that what xAI means? Kind of figured it had something to do with Grok but I wasn't sure.
To quote Dana Carvey's impression of George H. W. Bush, "Na ga da."
The crux: Buying tokens to generate public domain images is the rough equivalent of buying public domain images.
As things currently stand after the Thaler v Perlmutter decision last year, purely AI-generated images are public domain. They may not qualify for U.S. copyright protection, *unless* there is 'sufficient' human contribution that can effect the analysis. Of course, that may change eventually if the SCOTUS were to review the case (which they have declined to do).
But what is the standard for the analysis? Would I have any reliable legal leg to stand on? What would it cost to battle such a copyright dispute? Should I bother to try? Given those concerns, AI image generation isn't for me.
No thank you.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
